Archive for January, 2010

Earnings Recovery …..where ?

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

David Rosenberg did an exceptional job in his article in Monday’s Globe and Mail :
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/investment-ideas/features/experts-podium/can-both-the-economists-and-strategists-be-right/article1434137/
Essentially, he pinpoints how blatently the S&P 500 missed its aggregate earnings “estimate”, yet the market continues to make new highs:

“Forget all the calculations off the “artificial” March lows. Forget the 25 per-cent market slide in the first 10 weeks of the year to that awful trough. Here is the reality: The S&P 500, from point to point, rallied 23 per cent in 2009 even though earnings per share for the year as a whole cam in at a whopping $21 less than first estimated.
Now that is remarkable. It almost wants to make you believe in the tooth fairy. ”

The operating earnings estimate for the S&P 500 coming into 2009 was $77. For the actual earnings to come in at $56, is a 27% decline in earnings ! Now you tell me…….if you were invested in a good company stock, say Royal Bank, and they released earnings down 27% from the estimate, do you really think a rally of 23% in the stock would occur, or be justified ?

The S&P 500 is highly overvalued. The masses can feel good that the US has avoided a more severe recession, than might otherwise have happened, without a Fed throwing trillions of dollars at the economy. US economic reality will set in , sometime in 2010. Rest assured, the serious problems of very high unemployment, growing mortgage defaults and foreclosures, high and growing government deficits, will have to be addressed (when it comes to calculating any “real” recovery). The great news is that those investors that have taken measures to protect their portfolios, will have another great selection of investment opportunities (no diffferent than last year at this time, when you could have bought Oil, Gold, the S&P 500, TSX, China …….etc.)

For the next series of “blogs”, I will be discussing exactly where to invest , once this overdue correction is upon us.

Best regards,

Mike McGann
Director, Wealth Advisor

PIMCO reduces its exposure to US, UK debt

Monday, January 4th, 2010

PIMCO, the largest bond manager in the world, is reducing its exposure to US and UK bonds:

“Managing Director Paul McCulley said the supply/demand balance for U.S. and British government debt was likely to suffer as governments stepped up borrowing, and as buying by central banks eventually declined. “We’re probably going to have a $1.4 trillion deficit this year without the Fed on the buy side of the market for duration,” he said of U.S. Treasuries, in a report on Pimco’s website. “There is major uncertainty about how the supply/demand equation for duration will resolve itself when the Fed is out of the picture.” (cnbc.com Jan 4, 2010).

When the largest bond manager in the world is selling US bonds, its telling us, indirectly, that they believe the US fiscal mismanagement will lead to higher interest rates. Higher interest rates are bad for bonds (and stocks as well).

John Hussman, who I follow closely, puts out a weekly comment, and this week he is discussing the US Treasury’s decision to provide “unlimited financial support for the next three years”. (up to $300 Billion ) Essentially, the US Treasury continues to effectively buy dilinquent or bad mortgages from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as a way to absorb these bad debts. John explains:

“This policy is likely to lead to far more delinquencies. ……. What is likely in my view, is that we will observe far greater issuance of government liabilities, which will predictably create a near doubling of the consumer price index in the coming decade. It is notable that he massive expansion of government liabilities beginning in the late-1960’s eventually exploded into uncontrollable inflation by the late 1970’s. There are lags between the creation of government liabilities and their inflationary effects. But to expand these liabilities as recklessly as the Fed and Treasury are now doing, is to undermine the long-term foundations of the economy”.

Implications for the financial markets

“What we do know is that stocks are overvalued even on the basis of normalized earnings, to an extent that exceeds nearly every pre-1995 level except 1929. Intermediate term conditions are strenuously overbought, investors (with advisory sentiment now down to 15.6% bearishness) are clearly overbullish, and interest rate trends are pushing higher. This situation does not always resolve itself into market declines, and indeed, given that market internals remain reasonably firm, we may continue to observe marginal new highs for some amount of time. But the statistical regularity from overvalued, overbought, overbullish, rising yield environments is one of steep, abrupt market losses generally within a period of about 10-12 weeks. ”

2010 will provide some excellent investment opportunities for the patient investor. Stay tuned.

Happy New Year !

Mike